Supreme Court asked to BLOCK Biden’s student loan relief


Supreme Court asked to BLOCK Biden’s student loan relief before it starts: Wisconsin group calls plan unconstitutional and asks why taxpayers are having to bail out college-educated Americans

  •  In filing for an emergency injunction they claim the forgiveness plan is unconstitutional, oversteps its executive powers
  •  A taxpayer group and a Wisconsin conservative legal group together sent their request to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who handles that region 
  • The debt program allows 40 million Americans who earn less than $125,000 to receive up to $10,000 or Pell Grant recipients up to $20,000 to cover their debts

The Supreme Court has been asked to block President Joe Biden’s massive student loan forgiveness plan before it is officially rolled out.

The Brown County Taxpayers Association (BCTA) and the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) sent their request to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who handles such matters on behalf of the court for that region, asking them to put a hold on the relief plan before requests are processed this Sunday.

In filing for an emergency injunction they claim the move from the Biden administration is unconstitutional, oversteps its executive powers and targets American taxpayers. 

The groups filed the against Biden and Education Secretary Miguel Cardona earlier this month.  

Their forgiveness program allows 40 million Americans who earn less than $125,000 to receive up to $10,000 or Pell Grant recipients up to $20,000 to cover their debts.

The Congressional Budget Office last month said Biden’s ploy to wipe debt will cost the government $400 billion over 30 years and Republicans have said it unfairly taxes Americans who haven’t been to college. 

The Supreme Court has been asked to block President Joe Biden’s massive student loan forgiveness plan before it begins.

The Brown County Taxpayers Association (BCTA) and the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) sent their request to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who handles such matters on behalf of the court for that region

The Brown County Taxpayers Association (BCTA) and the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) sent their request to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who handles such matters on behalf of the court for that region

WILL President and General Counsel, Rick Esenberg, said: ‘It is critical that the U.S. Supreme Court weighs in on the President’s unconstitutional student loan relief plan before Sunday, when the loan forgiveness could start. 

‘WILL is proud to represent American taxpayers, and to bring the first claim to be submitted to SCOTUS.

BCTA President Rich Heidel added: ‘What Constitutional power does Biden have to take John Q. Public’s money and pay Jane Q. Public’s school loans? Why not her mortgage, why not her car loan? 

‘How did the college-educated caste become the lucky ones? When and how does this stop? This nonsense not only defies the US Constitution – it defies common sense! And, if President Biden is doing this under the auspices of the federal government, what redress does John Q. Public have other than to take the fight to the federal judiciary?’

The Biden administration has been attacked from all sides over the debt forgiveness plan. Seven GOP-led states and a number of conservative legal groups have filed suit across the country. 

Over the weekend the White House rolled out a beta version of the debt forgiveness application and more than eight million people submitted requests for relief. The official application launched on Monday. 

A federal judge earlier this month threw out the BCTA lawsuit, finding the taxpayer’s group did not have the standing to bring its legal challenge. 

The main challenge for those looking to overturn the policy is finding a plaintiff who can prove they’ve been harmed by it. 

The Wisconsin groups claim in their filing they are aware that the plaintiff must be able to claim direct injury, but the debt added to their tab as taxpayers should be enough. 

‘We are witnessing a gargantuan increase in the national debt accomplished by a complete disregard for limitations on the constitutional spending authority. Applicant and those similarly situated are being asked to assume perhaps over one trillion dollars in debt,’ the filing read. 

The GOP-led states are arguing that Biden does not have the authority to act without Congress on student loans and claiming the policy would harm private companies by reducing their business. 

Frank Garrison, an attorney working for a conservative legal group, brought the first challenge to the plan and argued he had the standing to claim injury because the debt forgiveness would count as taxable income in his state. 

Although borrowers are not required to pay federal income tax on their canceled student debt, thanks to a provision of Biden’s American Rescue Plan of 2021, some states, including Indiana, where Garrison resides, can charge taxes on the relief. 

Garrison was already pursuing tax-free debt cancellation through a government program, Public Service Loan Forgiveness, but says Biden’s plan now causes him to have a $1,000 tax bill. 





Source link